作业帮英语翻译Because manufacturing accounted for a relatively small fraction of aggregate output in the nineteenth century United States,our results do not imply that the diffusion of steam dramatically altered the course of aggregate productivity gro
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/05/06 05:59:08
英语翻译Because manufacturing accounted for a relatively small fraction of aggregate output in the nineteenth century United States,our results do not imply that the diffusion of steam dramatically altered the course of aggregate productivity gro
英语翻译
Because manufacturing accounted for a relatively small fraction of aggregate output in the nineteenth century United States,our results do not imply that the diffusion of steam dramatically altered the course of aggregate productivity growth.Nevertheless,they show that the di?usion of steam raised labor productivity in manufacturing and,if this di?usion had not occurred,the pace of industrialization would have been slower.Indeed,considering all of the specific technologies that diffused in manufacturing between 1850 and 1880,none may have had a bigger impact,in the sense of affecting more manufacturing workers,than the shift to steam power.
英语翻译Because manufacturing accounted for a relatively small fraction of aggregate output in the nineteenth century United States,our results do not imply that the diffusion of steam dramatically altered the course of aggregate productivity gro
在十九世纪,制造业在美国总体生产中占的比例比较小,因此我们的结果并不表明蒸汽（机）的普及显著地改变了美国的总体生产值增长.虽然如此,它们却表明了蒸汽机的普及使得制造业领域的人均生产力提升了,如果蒸汽没有普及,那么美国工业化的脚步将会被延迟.的确,1850年到1880年之间,没有任何一样新科技能像蒸汽机那样显著地改变制造业工人的工作.
因为生产占了一个相对很小的骨料输出在十九世纪的美国,我们的结果并不意味着扩散的蒸汽戏剧性的改变了总生产率的增长过程。不过,它们表明侧蒸汽?在制造业和劳动生产率的提高,如果这个?侧未发生,工业化已经慢。事实上,考虑到所有的具体技术扩散在制造1860年间,没有1880年可能会有一个更大的影响,在这种意义上的影响,更生产工人转移到蒸汽动力。...
全部展开
因为生产占了一个相对很小的骨料输出在十九世纪的美国,我们的结果并不意味着扩散的蒸汽戏剧性的改变了总生产率的增长过程。不过,它们表明侧蒸汽?在制造业和劳动生产率的提高,如果这个?侧未发生,工业化已经慢。事实上,考虑到所有的具体技术扩散在制造1860年间,没有1880年可能会有一个更大的影响,在这种意义上的影响,更生产工人转移到蒸汽动力。
收起